NetLab · Rules · Torrent Tracker · Have a problem? · Eng/Rus | Помощь Поиск Участники Галерея Календарь |
Здравствуйте Гость ( Вход | Регистрация | Активация ) | Повторно выслать письмо для активации |
Страницы: (3) < 1 2 [3] ( К непрочитанному сообщению ) |
The best talk about Led Zeppelin - The Song Remains the Same |
|
Отправлено: 29-11-2008, 13:53
(post 31, #867918)
|
||
Advanced Группа: Members Сообщений: 254 Рейтинг:0% |
I couldn't say it better! People are not robots. Releasers are not robots. People that listen to music definitely aren't robots... Robots don't listen music. Robots don't feel.., anything. I don't want a lot of 'thanks point' in my bank account..., already it's big enough. It doesn't work for me. I want to know what people thinks about music. Robots don't have opinions, they don't feel music. I want to see the people alive. Luckily, people are not robots. |
||
|
Отправлено: 01-12-2008, 03:47
(post 32, #868068)
|
||||
Junior Группа: Members Сообщений: 50 Рейтинг:0% |
I'm not even sure what you're trying to say but, to recap, I'm saying that the 2003 "remaster" isn't more compressed or louder than the Diament mastered version, contrary to your quote from Yury:
Maybe you're misinterpretating my words. Here are the two pics combined into one:
Again, I'm not sure what your point is but here's an image of the 2003 "remaster" version of No Quarter (from 400kbps m4a) and as you can see, it's virtually identical. Whatever differences there are between the 1986 Diament and 2003 releases appear to be minimal, at least based on the waveform. Feel free to upload a flac sample of the 1986 version so I can compare. |
||||
|
Отправлено: 01-12-2008, 06:30
(post 33, #868077)
|
||
Advanced Группа: Members Сообщений: 254 Рейтинг:0% |
Perfect! i've only say that the Barry Diament isn't compressed at all, flat tranfers... Sorry, i don't upload a sample for you.., but.., i don't understand why you don't 'load' my release yet.. There, you can pic all the samples what you want... Don't you have sufficient HDD space? ___ Well, by now., you're discovered that the Barry version and the 2003 one have the same master, based on the waveforms screens, obviously... I don't have the 2003 version.., and i don't want to 'load' it.., cause' i'm feel happy with my Diament one, and really i don't think that the 2003 will sounds better.., at least, they 'appear to be the same'.. Thanks for your tests and efforts anyway. Greetings. p.s: I'll very recommend you to swap your LOSSY disc for a LOSSLESS one.., the quality gain is so much..., just pic the mine (or btw 2003...).. Это сообщение отредактировал(а) bertox - 01-12-2008, 07:01 |
||
|
Отправлено: 01-12-2008, 20:56
(post 34, #868166)
|
||||
Junior Группа: Members Сообщений: 50 Рейтинг:0% |
I access a small wireless ISP where bandwidth is highly variable so I'd rather use it on stuff that I need. I'm behind an ISP router as well so emule transfers are slower than for most people (low ID).
I have the FLAC version, it's just at another location. I usually listen to ~400kbps AAC that I can use on my ipod. It's indistinguishable from lossless on the equipment I'm using. |
||||
|
Отправлено: 01-12-2008, 21:06
(post 35, #868167)
|
||
Advanced Группа: Members Сообщений: 254 Рейтинг:0% |
Perhaps your Lossless 'equipment' are bad..., cause' lossless are very 'distinguishable' at all..., maybe you are using an on-board soundcard with cheap speakers..., or maybe is time to wash your ears... Maybe you'll try to find the way to 'load' our releases.., if not.., they aren't any sense to discuss anything here.., sorry. I can't argue with people who listen to AAC or btw Lossy format..., i don't wanna waste my time. Greetings. Это сообщение отредактировал(а) bertox - 01-12-2008, 21:44 |
||
Страницы: (3) < 1 2 [3] |