The Rolling Stones, Got Live If You Want It! Remaster
 KillerRips Member is Offline
 Posted: 15-02-2004, 05:31 (post 1, #230525)

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 226
Warn:0%-----
Артист:The Rolling Stones
Альбом:Got Live If You Want It!, 1966
Жанр:Rock & Roll, Blues-Rock, British Invasion, Pop/Rock, British Blues
Формат файла:EAC-Ape-Cue-Cover
Ссылка:CD 4 clicks

A live document of the Brian Jones-era Stones sounds enticing, but the actual product is a letdown. The sound is lousy, and for that matter not all of it's live; a couple of old studio R&B covers were augmented by screaming fans that had obviously been overdubbed. Partially recorded at a 1966 Royal Albert Hall performance (where the audience rioted at the opening of the concert), the performances and singing are on the sloppy side (and sometimes alarmingly out of tune), the sound balance is atrocious, and several of the songs are taken at a let's-get-this-over-with-and-off-the-stage-before-we-get-torn-apart pace. It's a fun souvenir in its own way; just don't expect top-notch value, even factoring in the primitive state of live rock recording technology in 1966.
[The Rolling Stones' London/ABKCO catalog was reissued in August of 2002, packaged in digipaks with restored album artwork, remastered and released as hybrid discs that contain both CD and Super Audio CD layers. The remastering — performed with Direct Stream Digital (DSD) encoding — is a drastic improvement, leaping out of the speaker, yet still sounding like the original albums. This is noticeable on the standard CD layer, but is considerably more pronounced on the SACD layer, which is shockingly realistic in its detail and presence, yet is still faithful to the original mixes. Even if you've never considered yourself an audiophile, have never heard the differences between standard and gold-plated CDs, you will hear the difference with SACD, even on a cheap stereo system without a high-end amplifier or speakers. And you won't just hear the difference, you'll be an instant convert and wish, hope and pray that other artists whose catalog hasn't been reissued since the early days of CD — Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, Neil Young, especially the Beatles — are given the same treatment in the very near future. SACD and DSD are that good.]

1. Under My Thumb (Jagger/Richards) - 3:15
2. Get off of My Cloud (Jagger/Richards) - 3:31
3. Lady Jane (Jagger/Richards) - 3:10
4. Not Fade Away (Holly/Petty) - 2:02
5. I've Been Loving You Too Long (Butler/Redding) - 3:37
6. Fortune Teller (Neville/Spellman) - 2:37
7. The Last Time (Jagger/Richards) - 3:08
8. 19th Nervous Breakdown (Jagger/Richards) - 4:11
9. Time Is on My Side (Ragovoy) - 3:30
10. I'm Alright (Jagger/Richards) - 2:26
11. Have You Seen Your Mother, Baby Standing... (Jagger/Richards) - 3:00
12. (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction (Jagger/Richards) - 3:43



PM Email Poster
Top Bottom
 OlCh Member is Offline
 Posted: 06-09-2005, 21:06 (post 2, #464103)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%-----
весь 1966-й год - на перажарку ;)
PM Email Poster
Top Bottom
 OlCh Member is Offline
 Posted: 07-09-2005, 07:16 (post 3, #464298)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%-----
абшибaчка вышла :(
по техническим причинам расшаривается другой рип - by dougbrad81 :D

Rolling.Stones_1966.Got.Live.If.You.Want.It!.2002.hybrid.sacd.eac.flac.rar 8 clicks
Rolling.Stones-1966.Got.Live.If.You.Want.It!.2002.Remastered.scans.rar 6 clicks
PM Email Poster
Top Bottom
 Frodo71 Member is Offline
 Posted: 07-09-2005, 10:53 (post 4, #464353)

COBECTb

Group: Members
Posts: 2234
Warn:0%-----
хм. а чем он отличается от старого?
PM Email Poster
Top Bottom
 OlCh Member is Offline
 Posted: 07-09-2005, 11:50 (post 5, #464373)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%-----
QUOTE (Frodo71 @ 07-09-2005, 08:53)
хм. а чем он отличается от старого?
только тем что флак и полно источников, что мне лично облегчает жизню :rolleyes:
PM Email Poster
Top Bottom
 Frodo71 Member is Offline
 Posted: 07-09-2005, 18:11 (post 6, #464521)

COBECTb

Group: Members
Posts: 2234
Warn:0%-----
QUOTE (OlCh @ 07-09-2005, 00:50)
QUOTE (Frodo71 @ 07-09-2005, 08:53)
хм. а чем он отличается от старого?
только тем что флак и полно источников, что мне лично облегчает жизню :rolleyes:
а, так на этот файл был линк в сборном топе по Роллингам :)
PM Email Poster
Top Bottom
Topic Options