Herbert von Karajan-BP - Anton Bruckner-Symphony No. 4 'Romantic'
 OlCh Member is Offline
 Posted: 25-02-2007, 12:47 (post 1, #717903)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%-----
Herbert von Karajan - Berliner Philharmoniker 1970 - Anton Bruckner-Symphony No. 4 'Romantic'
Артист: Herbert von Karajan - Berliner Philharmoniker 1970
Альбом: Anton Bruckner-Symphony No. 4 'Romantic', 2004
Жанр: Classic, Orchestral Music
Формат файла: eac-cue-log-wv-scans-iso
Ссылка: CD 47 clicks
Нахождение: eDonkey/Kademlia
thanks to my friends :)

user posted image

Which Bruckner 4th to choose from Karajan?, December 31, 2005
Reviewer: Santa Fe listener
Karajan made two classic recordings of the Bruckner Fourth, one in 1970 for EMI--he had briefly jumped ship from DG over a cntract dispute--then again in 1975 when he returned to his home company. Both recordings are with the Berlin Phil., and both aspire to be the greatest Fourths in the catalog. Which one should you choose?
EMI 1970: Karajan is noticeably slower here, adding two min. to each movement compared with his later reading, except for the thrillingly fast Scherzo, which is the same on both. The broader pace allows for more expressive shaping, and the orchestra responds magnificently--just the opening string tremolos and hushed horn solo will have you holding your breath. Karajan was a sophisticate, the mirror opposite of the naive Bruckner, yet somehow he could clothe himself in simplicity and directness in this music. The Berlin strings are very sweet and tender when need be. The brass is enormous without being bombastic. As for sonics, the EMI version was recorded in the BPO's best location, the Jesus Christe Kirche, and the sound is clear and wide-ranging. At times the horns are a bit too recessed for maximum impact, but the climaxes come across without mircophone distortion.
DG 1975: This recording is out of print except in Karajan's complete Bruckner set. As a performance it is faster than the earlier one, which Karajan uses to achieve more immediate excitement. In all other respects the two readings are identical--Karajan tended to make up his mind once an interpretation was set. The deciding factor will probably be the sound. Recorded in the problematic Berlin Philharmonie, the orchestra sounds pinched and restricted compared to the EMI account, and there is a muffled haze in climaxes. In the loudest passages there is also a "crunch" that is not pleasant. These flaws aren't crippling, but they can't be overlooked, either.
Sometimes I feel it's worthwhile to own all of Karajan's various Bruckner interpretations--that's certainly true for Sym. 7, 8, and 9--but his EMI Fourth is so artistically complete that one should own it first and foremost. I can hardly imagine a more satisfying account, but this DG alternative comes close.


user posted image
Please take a second to encourage releaser for all his hard work, press 'Thanks' button
The following members said 'Спасибо!': nikanuf, bigkoala, твс, Arzy, Гордый, worand, arizonadream, Dudtsyn, Gwelgoth, Siget, adjonja, shatterhand
PM Email Poster
Top Bottom
 Arzy Member is Offline
 Posted: 22-11-2011, 23:01 (post 2, #1035544)

Pro Member

Group: Members
Posts: 886
Warn:0%-----
:help: отспасибивших мало, может есть у кого?
PM Email Poster ICQ
Top Bottom
 Гордый Member is Offline
   Posted: 22-11-2011, 23:19 (post 3, #1035548)

proRock
Forum moderator
Group: Netlab Soldier
Posts: 25093
Warn:0%-----
QUOTE (Arzy @ 22-11-2011, 21:01)
:help: отспасибивших мало, может есть у кого?
ну есть у меня. :p:
PM
Top Bottom
 Arzy Member is Offline
 Posted: 22-11-2011, 23:22 (post 4, #1035549)

Pro Member

Group: Members
Posts: 886
Warn:0%-----
хорошая серия, запостить бы другие линки
PM Email Poster ICQ
Top Bottom
 Arzy Member is Offline
 Posted: 26-11-2011, 13:54 (post 5, #1035916)

Pro Member

Group: Members
Posts: 886
Warn:0%-----
PM Email Poster ICQ
Top Bottom
Topic Options