NL -> Santana - 1970 Abraxas 1998 SACD Stereo (pg.1)

NetLab · Rules · Torrent Tracker · Have a problem? · Eng/Rus

Help

Members

Gallery

Calendar

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register | Validation )

Resend Validation Email

NetLab -> Forums -> Music -> Super Sound -> Topic: Santana - 1970 Abraxas 1998 SACD Stereo

Pages: (2) [1] 2 > ( Show unread post )

Santana - 1970 Abraxas 1998 SACD Stereo, DVD-Audio MLP Stereo 24bit/96kHz

Print topic |

OlCh

Posted: 06-09-2006, 08:40 (post 1, #649769)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%

Артист:	Santana
Альбом:	Abraxas 1970, 1998
Жанр:	Rock
Формат файла:	DVD-Audio MLP 2.0 24bit/96kHz, scans, rar
Ссылка 1:	MLP 132 clicks
Ссылка 2:	Rest 100 clicks
Нахождение:	eDonkey/Kademlia

а на сей раз в роли начальника отдела снабжения - kokiku! :punk:

thanks to kokiku and other friends

QUOTE

Review by Alex Henderson
The San Francisco Bay Area rock scene of the late '60s was one that encouraged radical experimentation and discouraged the type of mindless conformity that's often plagued corporate rock. When one considers just how different Santana, Jefferson Airplane, Moby Grape, and the Grateful Dead sounded, it becomes obvious just how much it was encouraged. In the mid-'90s, an album as eclectic as Abraxas would be considered a marketing exec's worst nightmare. But at the dawn of the 1970s, this unorthodox mix of rock, jazz, salsa, and blues proved quite successful. Whether adding rock elements to salsa king Tito Puente's "Oye Como Va," embracing instrumental jazz-rock on "Incident at Neshabur" and "Samba Pa Ti," or tackling moody blues-rock on Fleetwood Mac's "Black Magic Woman," the band keeps things unpredictable yet cohesive. Many of the Santana albums that came out in the '70s are worth acquiring, but for novices, Abraxas is an excellent place to start.

QUOTE

Only For Stereo But Excellent Music And Recording For Its Time, July 25, 2005
Reviewer: Joel G. Alabastro "Joel Alabastro" (Sugar Land, Texas)
It is too bad if you expect 5.1 or 7.1 surround from this SACD. The remastering engineer is too honest to reprocess this to 5.1 or multichannel that during the time or recording was not available.
SACD Stereo is meant for stereophiles or audiophiles with equipment carefully chosen to bring out the best in recorded stereo music for two channels only...and never for 5.1 channels unless you have a DSP which will remove the essence of the recording anyway. And I have to emphasize the quality of the playback system since SACD has higher frequency data not possible to be included in the CD. If your system can only playnack the audible frequencies then you are missing a lot of information particulary imaging (depth and width) and ambience.
In short, the SACD version blows away the CD version only if you have the right equipment. I could hear the increased in depth of the soundstage and clarity of the instruments...My comparison is based on a remastered CD played on a very good CD player, versus this SACD played on a midrange SACD/DVD-A player. The CD player costs 3 times as much as the SACD player but still the SACD wins hands down.
So before you write reviews for or against this SACD make sure that you have the listened to it using the right equipment...

QUOTE

More resolution than the standard cd, in pristine 2 channel, February 14, 2005
Reviewer: S. Ragland
Ok, ok... Let some things straight. This is a standard Stereo SACD. If you were expecting multichannel then it's your fault for not reading the info about it. There are many of us who prefer 2 speakers over 5.1 or even 7.1 surround. We were born with 2 ears right... not 7.1 (lol) This matter does not suprise me because its still the case that most people think cds are more valuable than vinyl for sound. Most of us cant spend the money on expensive vinyl equipment but thats another case and still the vinyl itself will always carry more information than a little cd format could ever. It's not anyones fault that people buy cheap stereo equipment and expect nothing less than an inprovement with the sacds. A salute to two channel audio lovers out there. sorry... but 2 channel will always exist... nor will it ever depart these lands.

Please take a second to encourage releaser for all his hard work, press 'Thanks' button

The following members said 'Спасибо!':

rits, hmuray, meurglys3, pbnmjk, luchianr

Michael2000

Posted: 06-09-2006, 21:02 (post 2, #649977)

Уже не тот, совсем не тот...

Group: Netlab Soldier
Posts: 7376
Warn:0%

Громадное спасибо.

OlCh

Posted: 08-09-2006, 08:02 (post 3, #650596)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%

А между прочим, если даже просто сконвертировать 24/96 в 16/44.1, то получим очень хороший ремастер-ЦД! не хуже японского 2006 :w00t:

разве что не та полиграфия, зато с тремя бонусами! :punk:

taurus66

Posted: 10-09-2006, 08:09 (post 4, #651370)

созерцатель
Forum moderator

Group: Netlab Soldier
Posts: 13213
Warn:0%

OlCh
Вопрос.Каким образом разделить имидж на оотдельные треки,А то Вельдер записывает все одним файлом...

OlCh

Posted: 10-09-2006, 10:49 (post 5, #651395)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%

уважаемый товарисч taurus66 :punk:

как уже лично вам сообчал и повторяю!:

Post Link: Creedence Clearwater Revival ...y And The Poor Boys post8
Topic Link: Frederic Chopin - Ballades a...9 Arthur Rubinstein post10 :hi:

Uzaren

Posted: 10-09-2006, 11:31 (post 6, #651402)

Герой Асфальта

Group: Roots
Posts: 18547

Эх вот бы кто взялся мануал в отдельный топик написать :rolleyes:

А то народ дюже ленивый пошёл, лень юзать поиск :actu:

taurus66

Posted: 10-09-2006, 12:19 (post 7, #651414)

созерцатель
Forum moderator

Group: Netlab Soldier
Posts: 13213
Warn:0%

Uzaren

Вот слова не мальчика,но мужа :rolleyes:

OlCh
Спасибо, Мин Херц,попробую разобраться :w00t:

OlCh

Posted: 10-09-2006, 13:44 (post 8, #651435)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%

QUOTE (Uzaren @ 10-09-2006, 09:31)

А то народ дюже ленивый пошёл, лень юзать поиск :actu:

сказал шеф :punk:

QUOTE (taurus66 @ 10-09-2006, 10:19)

Вот слова не мальчика,но мужа

и народ согласился! :laugh:

Oven

Posted: 10-09-2006, 17:38 (post 9, #651510)

Advanced

Group: Members
Posts: 420
Warn:0%

А писать все равно хрен кто будет...

dragut

Posted: 12-12-2008, 21:29 (post 10, #869839)

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 150
Warn:0%

Ребята, раздайте Ссылка 2: Rest ?
Я писать буду

This post has been edited by dragut on 12-12-2008, 21:30

OlCh

Posted: 12-12-2008, 21:42 (post 11, #869844)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%

QUOTE (dragut @ 12-12-2008, 19:29)

Я писать буду

куда? в соответствующие инстанции? :laugh:

нетерпеливый ты наш :rolleyes:

но кнопка транслит-конверт уже нашлась

потому держи КУЙ:

SPOILER (CUESHEET for DiscWelder)

dragut

Posted: 12-12-2008, 22:14 (post 12, #869858)

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 150
Warn:0%

QUOTE (OlCh @ 12-12-2008, 21:42)

QUOTE (dragut @ 12-12-2008, 19:29)

Я писать буду

куда? в соответствующие инстанции? :laugh:

нетерпеливый ты наш :rolleyes:

но кнопка транслит-конверт уже нашлась

потому держи КУЙ:

Хе

спасибо. Да нет: привате – это одно а так... сща попробую резать...
А транслит... вот он:
http://orwell.ru/info/tools/

OlCh

Posted: 12-12-2008, 22:22 (post 13, #869865)

риполов-любитель

Group: News makers
Posts: 12604
Warn:0%

QUOTE (dragut @ 12-12-2008, 20:14)

А транслит... вот он:
http://orwell.ru/info/tools/

да он в форум вмонтирован :drag:

dragut

Posted: 12-12-2008, 22:37 (post 14, #869869)

Member

Group: Members
Posts: 150
Warn:0%

Он кривой. Как и у всех. Ведь ГОСТ есть: http://orwell.ru/info/tliter.html

Ну товарищ... работает собака!!! Я уже подумал: все. Сегодня начал его резать своим CUE а он так обиделся!! 25 каналов у тебя говорит... не хочу

Думаю с картиночками проблемы будут или его просто NTSC сделать? По любому, сщас когда ISO есть, делай чо хочешь

Играет ничего

Шумит, поет себе

Спасибо тебе!!! Thanks to kokiku too!

Что там в этом рест: коврики его есть?

This post has been edited by dragut on 12-12-2008, 22:47