И еще раз спасибо! :punk:
KajJacob
@ 21-10-2007, 07:42
After running auCDtect (with frontend ver 1.2.2):
Processing file: 1/1 [Madonna.-.Like.A.Virgin.[Japan.32XD-102].[1984].wav]
This track is not an authentic CDA file!
It has a lossy (mp3, mpc, vqf...) origin with probability 95%
:(
???
yury_usa
@ 21-10-2007, 07:47
KajJacob
I can assure you, the CD is 100% original. I never bothered to check wuth auCDtect. Try checking separate tracks, or check audio spectrum. Try unpacking the iso.wv in winrar, and the converting wv file to wav. I suspect that auCD tect is reading extra bits of info, or you are doing something wrong.. :drag:
KajJacob
@ 21-10-2007, 07:55
@yury_usa
Here's the result of individual tracks:
Processing file: 1/9 [01 Material Girl.wav]
This track appears to be lossless with probability 87%
Processing file: 2/9 [02 Angel.wav]
This track appears to be lossless with probability 62%
Processing file: 3/9 [03 Like A Virgin.wav]
This track appears to be lossless with probability 100%
Processing file: 4/9 [04 Over And Over.wav]
Could not qualify the source of this track.
Processing file: 5/9 [05 Love Don't Live Here Anymore.wav]
This track is not an authentic CDA file!
It has a lossy (mp3, mpc, vqf...) origin with probability 79%
Processing file: 6/9 [06 Dress You Up.wav]
This track appears to be lossless with probability 100%
Processing file: 7/9 [07 Shoo-Bee-Doo.wav]
Could not qualify the source of this track.
Processing file: 8/9 [08 Pretender.wav]
This track is not an authentic CDA file!
It has a lossy (mp3, mpc, vqf...) origin with probability 95%
Processing file: 9/9 [09 Stay.wav]
This track appears to be lossless with probability 100%
WARNING: There were 2 tracks in the selection which was not lossless.
WARNING: 2 tracks could not be analysed
So I beleive you're right!
This is lossless material and you can't always trust auCDtect :) :rolleyes:
yury_usa
@ 21-10-2007, 08:00
yury_usa
Most likely, it happens because the CD is quite old (23 years!)
So, a lot of recordings were not up to the modern digital standards, peak levels are generally lowers, etc. That doesn't mean that is sounds worse, on the contrary I think it's as close to the origianal vinyl pressing, as CD could get :)
Keykey
@ 21-10-2007, 13:39
Fu** auCDtect :diablo:
It is probably the worst shit published in years. If a reputed releseaer states it is an original CD, it has to be :rolleyes:
Besides, I have already said taht I have proved auCDtect WRONG many times. It is NOT a trusty programme, Enough said.
The results of the "loose tracks" experiment are simply very funny :lol: :lol:
:hi: