PINK FLOYD - DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

(The Original Quadraphonic Mix by Alan Parsons)

(24/96khz 4.1 & 2.0 DPLII)



Track List:
01 - Speak to me
02 - Breathe
03 - On the run
04 - Time
05 - The great gig in the sky
06 - Money
07 - Us and them
08 - Any colour you like
09 - Brain damage
10 - Eclipse


Well, here we are with the nth version of DSOTM.
This time is the original Quad Mix by Alan Parsons taken directly from the Tape Master. And here are my comments:

I premise that i've heard ALL the version of DSOTM existing including the original Quad Vinil. But here we go.

Spatiality:
The first thing that come to mind is the evident increased spatiality. Even in the DPLII version there is more, more room and all the instruments are separated and defined like in no other version.

Contents:
The really interesting thing of this Mixing, is that we can hear for the first time, notes, and parts we never imagined could exist. From sax tremolo brutally cut-off from the official, to very subtle synth and guitar modulation, and so expanded piano textures that are really intriguing, adding even more fascination to that already present in the official.

Timbre:
From a mastering point of view, the sound is clear, defined. But the strange sensation is that the sound seems "oversharpened", it lacks those frequencies that made DarkSide... well DarkSideOfTheMoon :) And here comes the conclusion

Conclusion:
Spatially is a different version from all the others, and is very well mastered. The instruments are where they are supposed to be, and the rotating is just... right. From a mastering point of view the sound is clear is defined. But why i don't seem convinced...? Well my final impression, is that this version lacks "Life". What is a "Life" for an album? Well is that thing that when you listen to it you say... "Wow, it lives". And this version lacks it. Totally. Sounds good, but it's far from you.
So, in the end. If you want to "study" the album with all the sleeves, this is for you.
If you want to LIVE the album, well the MFSL is and remains the REAL SOUL of Dark Side Of The Moon.

LINK:

Pink.Floyd.-.Dark.Side.Of.The.Moon.( ... (24bit.96khz.4.1.to.2.0.DPLII).(Ape.Cue).rar

Pink.Floyd.-.Dark.Side.Of.The.Moon.( ... Parsons).(24bit.96khz.4.1).(WavPack.Cue).rar

3ngel
Thank you! Plz use Topic Link: English release form next you release :wink:

а теперь скажите какой прогой это на диск прожечь

стерео можно заделать Audio DVD Creator - video_ts
a 4.1 - DiscWelder - audio_ts, а потом прожечь разом DiscJuggler, не знаю только поместится ли? а вообще то это всё, как я понимаю рипнуто с готового ДВД-аудио :w00t:

слушал, потому и говорю... а ты то ДВД-аудио слушал?
посмотри на характерисики - точно ДВД, точнее CD upmix to DVD-Audio Topic Link: Лучшие На Сегодняшний День В...ов Pink Floyd!

Я не знаком с файлами *.wv

I downloaded the 4.1 mix. How i can make a dvd-audio? Do i need to convert them to mlp? How can i do that? Surcode mlp encoder wants each channel as seperate file, but i have one file with 4.1 channels.

nautilus7
download
Pink.Floyd-The.Dark.Side.Of.The.Moon(2003.SACD.to.DVD-AUDIO.5.1.24-96)audio_ts.scans.by.server.alliance.iso
it is already DVD-audio 5.1 24/96 :punk:

No no no, you didn't get it :lol:

I have already download this one too, but i would like to make a dvd-a with the Alan Parsons' mix!

Thanks anyway.

nautilus7
you don't need to convert anything. It is already pre-made for burning I believe. I got the ISO and burned it with nero. Or you can just burn it with DiscJuggler by dragging AUDIO_TS and VIDEO_TS folders :)

yury_usa
ну хотя бы головной пост посмотрел :music2:

nautilus7

do you want make dvd-audio 24/96 of this WAV:

Digion Audio2 can convert WAV to MLP direct :)
But it is't good idea upmix 44.1kHz to 96kHz :(

compare please with WAV 24/96 of SACD:

But it is 96 KHz /24 Bit. Look the 1st post of this thread.

Thanks for your help!

nautilus7
again to you:
it is a screen of Left channel Pink.Floyd.-.Dark.Side.Of.The.Moon.(The.Original.Quadraphonic.Mix.by.Alan.Parsons).(24bit.96khz.4.1).wav

if WAV is 96kHz freguency analysis must to show linear characterestic to 48 kHz, but we can to see only to ~22 kHz :( Source was only 44.1 kHz :fu:

END :drag:

OK, i got it!

Shoudn't be a good idea then to write in the 1st post that the source was only 44,1 KHz?